Amazon.ca:Customer reviews: Geopolitical Alpha: An Investment Framework for Predicting the Future
Skip to main content
.ca
Hello Select your address
All
EN
Hello, sign in
Account & Lists
Returns & Orders
Cart
All
Best Sellers New Releases Deals Store Prime Customer Service Home Electronics Books Sell Kindle Books Sports & Outdoors Fashion Coupons Health & Household Computers Computer & Video Games Toys & Games Gift Ideas Automotive Gift Cards Beauty & Personal Care Home Improvement Pet Supplies Audible Grocery Baby Subscribe & save Music
New Deals Everyday
Today's Deals Watched Deals Outlet Deals Warehouse Deals Coupons eBook Deals Subscribe & Save

  • Geopolitical Alpha: An Investment Framework for Predicting the Future
  • ›
  • Customer reviews

Customer reviews

4.4 out of 5 stars
4.4 out of 5
437 global ratings
5 star
66%
4 star
20%
3 star
9%
2 star
2%
1 star
2%
Geopolitical Alpha: An Investment Framework for Predicting the Future

Geopolitical Alpha: An Investment Framework for Predicting the Future

byMarko Papic
Write a review
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
See All Buying Options

Top positive review

All positive reviews›
Juan Correa
5.0 out of 5 starsA Unique Book
Reviewed in Canada 🇨🇦 on July 15, 2021
Geopolitical Alpha begins with a simple premise: “Preferences are optional and subject to constraints, whereas constraints are neither optional nor subject to preferences.” This fundamental asymmetry leads to the main idea of the book: If you wish to forecast geopolitical trends do not focus on what policymakers want to do but rather what they can actually do.

Elegant as this framework might be, the devil is in the details. The value of the book not only comes from the framework itself but from its application to real world scenarios. Marko shows through numerous case studies how to use his constraint framework - as well the insights of political science like game theory and the median voter theorem - to forecast geopolitical trends. Moreover, he gets down to the nitty-gritty: when should political experts be (or not be) trusted, how voters preferences and economic and financial conditions determine policy maker actions, how in certain scenarios the constraint framework might fail in producing an accurate forecast.

And yet, what makes this book unique in the genre is that it goes one step further. Whereas a political strategist will stop at making predictions, Marko understand from his experience in the investment world that this is not enough. Success in markets is not making the right forecast, but actually making money from your predictions. With this in mind, he adapts his geopolitical framework to the realities of the market, making it a much more useful book for investors who wish to apply his insights when managing their portfolios.

Finally, the book is both personal and wonderfully written, peppered with wit, history and hilarious anecdotes. Overall, if you wish to gain an understanding of how to predict geopolitical trends and how to use these forecast to make money in financial markets, I would definitely recommend this book.
Read more
2 people found this helpful

Top critical review

All critical reviews›
Benoit Brouillette
1.0 out of 5 starsBad purchase
Reviewed in Canada 🇨🇦 on December 1, 2020
Quite boring sorry
Read more
One person found this helpful

Sign in to filter reviews
Filtered by
CriticalClear filter
60 total ratings, 9 with reviews

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

Translate all reviews to English

From Canada

Benoit Brouillette
1.0 out of 5 stars Bad purchase
Reviewed in Canada 🇨🇦 on December 1, 2020
Verified Purchase
Quite boring sorry
One person found this helpful
Helpful
Report
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


From other countries

Andrew
3.0 out of 5 stars Interesting thesis, questionable application and writing
Reviewed in the United Kingdom 🇬🇧 on September 19, 2021
Verified Purchase
The main thesis of this book is useful to contemplate. Papic urges market participants to assess the probability of an event based on the material constraints of decision makers, not what they say, or even what they want. The book is strongest in passages that deal with Draghi, Greece, and the euro crisis, as well as China's policymaking agenda, which often seems opaque and dictatorial but is in fact based on the same material constrains (what the median Chinese citizens expects of the state) as Western democracies, in his view. This is useful knowledge for financial professionals trying to understand how geopolitics and markets interact.

Where the book fails to realise its full potential is the post-assessment phase: once you think you have ascertained the material constraints on a decision maker's action, what should you do? Each intersection of finance and geopolitics is so nuanced, so unique and so overwhelmed with information that parsing the noise is incredibly difficult without or without his framework, and to make trades or investments based off only one such perspective seems a stretch. Readers are presented with several examples of where Papic 'called' a geopolitical event: say the overestimation of Bolsonaro and Brazil versus Mexico and Lopez Obrador in FX. The proposed trade was long MXN/BRL, which apparently netted 11.2% in just over a year to 2019. Given that the S&P 500 returned over 30% that year, you'd be forgiven for wondering what all your hard work was for. (Comparing currencies to equities isn't quite fair - I'm just illustrating that for the layman or long term investor, this is book isn't particularly relevant)

The trade 'worked', but to make such a decision based off purely geopolitical factors is incredibly risky. The (admittedly abridged) assessment included nothing about the role of each country's central bank, effects of commodity prices on each respective currency, rates of inflation, influence of USD or other currencies, etc. It strikes me that Papic got lucky in that he made the correct geopolitical call while ignoring the other highly complex factors that influence currency moves, fortunate that other non-political events didn't derail his trade over that particular time period. We also hear curiously little about Papic's failures or his proven alpha; as a strategist, surely his firm has the numbers on his value add over and above the market? In other words, does this approach actually have firm quantitative evidence that it works?

Then there is the writing style. Personally, I found the book jarring to read. The majority of the book is well written, but it is interspersed with irrelevant personal tangents and anecdotes, or long footnotes that add nothing or actually detract from the flow of the book.

I would end by saying that this book is probably worth a read if you're interested in geopolitics and markets, but is unlikely to fundamentally change how you invest. It's mainly written with trading in mind, and if you're a long term, long only investor it's probably not wise to try to generate 'alpha' based on this short-medium term framework.
12 people found this helpful
Report
Curt Doolittle
3.0 out of 5 stars Not necessarily bad, or wrong, but oversimplified, and beneath expectations.
Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on June 9, 2022
Verified Purchase
It's possible that I expected too much from the book given the publicity and recommendations. It's not a substantive work, for investors or economists, or even geostrategists. The work can be reduced to the rather obvious late 19th-century mandate that all humans act in rational self-interest, by following incentives, that they act within material constraints, and only within those material constraints, do, and can, strategic, political, economic, and individual preferences be expressed.

How this differs from Sun Tzu, Machiavelli, Clausewitz, and Liddel-Hart, or Locke, Smith, Hume, and Blackstone, or any of the marginalists, Hayekians, Beckerians, and behavioral economists, or any of cognitive scientists, neuroscientists, or any of the artificial intelligence researchers, is beyond me.

In every generation, in every field, someone in that field counters the natural human tendency to confuse the behavior of local individuals under norms, values, and institutions, with the amorality, brutality, and empirical reality that we are always and everywhere at war, and religion, philosophy, politics, and economics are the means by which we redirect warfare to the production of competing commons that increase capital versus outright warfare that destroys it.

We train each other in a society with via-positiva goods, but the purpose of these individual behavioral goods is to conduct sufficient reproductive, cultural, economic, technological, and political warfare to preserve our choice of how to do so, by the production of sovereignty.

But in this comforting illusion we call 'morality' we easily forget that there are those whose duty it is to preserve that sovereignty, and they are NOT bound by morality first, but by material constraints, and that morality is a, convenience not a necessity or utility.

For this reason, educating us from good peasants to responsible adults requires we abandon the via-positiva optimism of our childhood if what we are responsible for is participating in that reproductive, social, economic, technological, political, or military warfare - so that we can accurately predict the behavior of those others who must do the same.

In other words, understand the material incentives that decision-makers are subject to. Because moralizing isn't scarce, but resources are.

I expected a repetition of this message, and what I found in this book wasn't sufficient.

It's not bad. It's just not enough of what we need.
8 people found this helpful
Report
Mihail Iliev
3.0 out of 5 stars Entertaining to read but content is a bit naive
Reviewed in Germany 🇩🇪 on September 12, 2021
Verified Purchase
The books is chatty, easy to read and has too many shortcuts. It sounds like casually talking to well-versed buddy in a pub.

Papic makes sweeping confident pronouncing based on very thin and naive analysis. He also seems to misrepresent what other analysts are saying in order to contrast his, allegedly superior foresight.

While Papic is in principle right to say that policy makers face constraints and influence their decisions he fails to admit that history shows how constraints can be overcome by ideology. For instance the WW1 should not have happened because the German commercial fleet was insured in Llloyd's in London and both Germany and Great Britain had a lot at stake. The constraints clearly indicated that war was not in the interest of either Germany or Britain. But ideology trumped constraints.

Similarly, in 1940 Adolf Hitler faced the constraints of having unprepared Wehrmacht for the WW2, as vehemently emphasised by his generals. But again policy preferences trumped constraints. Moreover, by luck Germany managed to outmanoeuvre France (whose supreme command ignored intelligence about German's intentions) and was victorious, thus trumping in constraints on many levels.

Papic also misunderstands the fact that policy preferences, once pursued despite constraints, over time can change the constraints. And what may seem outlandish at a point in time, by sheer "irrational" persistence of the policy maker can become possible and even likely.

To prove his point Papic on many occasions misrepresents what other analysts have said. Regarding the Greek crisis most pundits were saying that Greece would be better off exiting the Euro area not because they wanted that to happen but more as a tool to make Germany aware of the issues and make them see that it is in their interest to compromise with Greece. So in essence, Papic is saying the same thing as the pundits but in a much more unsophisticated and naive (pub-like-chatter way) and claims to have been right while the others were wrong. Papic is being funny here.

Papic's comments on Trump and NATO are also disingenuous. He tries to make a point that America faced the constraint that it was in its overriding interest to keep NATO well-functioning. Thus Trump was forced to say that US is committed to NATO. And thus the pundits were wrong that Trump was bad for NATO. But this is downright nonsense. Trump's vulgar transactionalism was indeed bad for NATO, he destroyed the trust among allies and the effect of Trumpism on NATO will be long-lasting.

Moreover, Papic does not understand how markets work. When faced with uncertainty markets assume the worst possible scenario. Of course one can make money on that. That's not a unique Papic insight. But unfortunately once in a while the worst case scenario does materialise. And the problem is one never knows when that would happen.

Apart from that Papic also does not understand economics. And I mean depression economics. To genuinely understand depression economics one needs to look at it from a Keynesian point of view and not just textbook New Keynesain but go a bit deeper. Papic does not go father than a simplified ECON 101 neoliberal point of view. And that is another weakness of his narrative that makes his book not that insightful for the current situation we are in.

Overall, I give the book three stars because it is curious to read this book and it makes an attempt towards useful from a practical point of view out-of-the-box thinking.
8 people found this helpful
Report
AH
3.0 out of 5 stars Entertaining, but needs a little prior worldly knowledge to get his humor.
Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on July 19, 2021
Verified Purchase
The author has a very good grasp of what this book is about and sticks to the point, with some humor spread out. This makes the book easy to read and be engaged in.

However, the 3-stars are because his recommended geopolitical analysis source only provides intelligence to hedge funds, sovereign funds, and private equity (you get the point). NOT THE AVERAGE JOE. Where does the proletariat find their geopolitical analysis and insight that is good?
3 people found this helpful
Report
Paul Wilczewski
1.0 out of 5 stars Generate alpha by not buying this book
Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on March 30, 2023
Verified Purchase
The book is a collection of random stories about recent political events and personal anecdotes. It contains no meaningful analysis and no actionable methodology. He gives exactly one example of a geopolitical trade made by a client he was advising. In 2019 that trade generated an 11% return. That same year the S&P 500 generated a 28% return. That's a -17% alpha. The data speaks for itself.
Report
Daniel Yi
3.0 out of 5 stars Interesting and unique perspective on markets
Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on June 4, 2021
Verified Purchase
I really like his perspective - a constraints based approach to making investment decisions. He’s wrong about climate change (had to ding a star) but the ‘beauty’ of his framework is i can substitute in my own priors about that particular topic and the rest of his approach still stands on its own.
Report
Amazon Kunde
1.0 out of 5 stars It could have been so great
Reviewed in Germany 🇩🇪 on March 10, 2021
Verified Purchase
I was disappointed. The cover, the idea of the book are very nice, but the content only average with many "factual shortcuts" which are not full, but which try to fit the hypotheses. The author also tried to fit on purpose some fancy words from oxford dictionary only to make the text smarter. Quality of the paper is very low.
Customer image
Amazon Kunde
1.0 out of 5 stars It could have been so great
Reviewed in Germany 🇩🇪 on March 10, 2021
I was disappointed. The cover, the idea of the book are very nice, but the content only average with many "factual shortcuts" which are not full, but which try to fit the hypotheses. The author also tried to fit on purpose some fancy words from oxford dictionary only to make the text smarter. Quality of the paper is very low.
Images in this review
Customer image Customer image
Customer imageCustomer image
One person found this helpful
Report
Krüger
1.0 out of 5 stars Gebrauchtes Buch mit Eselsecken, nicht einfoliert!
Reviewed in Germany 🇩🇪 on December 17, 2021
Verified Purchase
Nicht einfoliertes Buch mit Eselsecken, was soll das?? Ich bezahle viel Geld, dafür will ich auch viel Leistung und/oder beste Qualität sehen!!
Report
Translate review to English

Need customer service? Click here
‹ See all details for Geopolitical Alpha: An Investment Framework for Predicting the Future

Your recently viewed items and featured recommendations
›
View or edit your browsing history
After viewing product detail pages, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages that interest you.

Back to top
Get to Know Us
  • Careers
  • Amazon and Our Planet
  • Investor Relations
  • Press Releases
  • Amazon Science
Make Money with Us
  • Sell on Amazon
  • Supply to Amazon
  • Become an Affiliate
  • Protect & Build Your Brand
  • Sell on Amazon Handmade
  • Advertise Your Products
  • Independently Publish with Us
  • Host an Amazon Hub
Amazon Payment Products
  • Amazon.ca Rewards Mastercard
  • Shop with Points
  • Reload Your Balance
  • Amazon Currency Converter
  • Gift Cards
  • Amazon Cash
Let Us Help You
  • COVID-19 and Amazon
  • Shipping Rates & Policies
  • Amazon Prime
  • Returns Are Easy
  • Manage your Content and Devices
  • Customer Service
English
Canada
Amazon Music
Stream millions
of songs
Amazon Advertising
Find, attract and
engage customers
Amazon Business
Everything for
your business
Amazon Drive
Cloud storage
from Amazon
Amazon Web Services
Scalable Cloud
Computing Services
 
Book Depository
Books With Free
Delivery Worldwide
Goodreads
Book reviews
& recommendations
IMDb
Movies, TV
& Celebrities
Amazon Photos
Unlimited Photo Storage
Free With Prime
Shopbop
Designer
Fashion Brands
 
Warehouse Deals
Open-Box
Discounts
Whole Foods Market
We Believe in
Real Food
Amazon Renewed
Like-new products
you can trust
Blink
Smart Security
for Every Home
 
  • Conditions of Use
  • Privacy Notice
  • Interest-Based Ads
© 1996-2023, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates