Katherine Levine Einstein
Similar authors to follow
Manage your follows
About Katherine Levine Einstein
Katherine Levine Einstein is an assistant professor of political science at Boston University and faculty fellow at Boston University's Initiative on Cities. She joined the department in 2012 after receiving her Ph.D. in Government and Social Policy at Harvard University and B.A. in political science from Yale University. Her research and teaching interests broadly include local politics and policy, racial and ethnic politics, and American public policy. Her first book Do Facts Matter? Information and Misinformation in Democratic Politics (with Jennifer Hochschild, University of Oklahoma Press 2015) investigates the harmful effects of misinformation on democratic politics. Her second book Neighborhood Defenders: Participatory Politics and America's Housing Crisis (with David Glick and Maxwell Palmer) explores the politics of housing development. She is currently one of the principal investigators of the Menino Survey of Mayors, a multi-year data set of survey-interviews of U.S. mayors exploring a wide variety of political and policy issues. She also serves on the editorial board of the Urban Affairs Review. Her research has been supported by the National Science Foundation, Russell Sage Foundation, and Rockefeller Foundation.
Customers Also Bought Items By
Books By Katherine Levine Einstein
A democracy falters when most of its citizens are uninformed or misinformed, when misinformation affects political decisions and actions, or when political actors foment misinformation—the state of affairs the United States faces today, as this timely book makes painfully clear. In Do Facts Matter? Jennifer L. Hochschild and Katherine Levine Einstein start with Thomas Jefferson’s ideal citizen, who knows and uses correct information to make policy or political choices. What, then, the authors ask, are the consequences if citizens are informed but do not act on their knowledge? More serious, what if they do act, but on incorrect information?
Analyzing the use, nonuse, and misuse of facts in various cases—such as the call to impeach Bill Clinton, the response to global warming, Clarence Thomas’s appointment to the Supreme Court, the case for invading Iraq, beliefs about Barack Obama’s birthplace and religion, and the Affordable Care Act—Hochschild and Einstein argue persuasively that errors of commission (that is, acting on falsehoods) are even more troublesome than errors of omission. While citizens’ inability or unwillingness to use the facts they know in their political decision making may be frustrating, their acquisition and use of incorrect “knowledge” pose a far greater threat to a democratic political system.
Do Facts Matter? looks beyond individual citizens to the role that political elites play in informing, misinforming, and encouraging or discouraging the use of accurate or mistaken information or beliefs. Hochschild and Einstein show that if a well-informed electorate remains a crucial component of a successful democracy, the deliberate concealment of political facts poses its greatest threat.