
The Technology Trap: Capital, Labor, and Power in the Age of Automation
Audible Audiobook
– Unabridged
Amazon Price | New from | Used from |
Kindle Edition
"Please retry" | — | — |
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial |
Hardcover, Illustrated
"Please retry" | $29.40 | $23.93 |
How the history of technological revolutions can help us better understand economic and political polarization in the age of automation
From the Industrial Revolution to the age of artificial intelligence, The Technology Trap takes a sweeping look at the history of technological progress and how it has radically shifted the distribution of economic and political power among society’s members. As Carl Benedikt Frey reveals, the Industrial Revolution created unprecedented wealth and prosperity over the long run, but the immediate consequences of mechanization were devastating for large swaths of the population. Middle-income jobs withered, wages stagnated, the labor share of income fell, profits surged, and economic inequality skyrocketed. These trends, Frey documents, broadly mirror those in our current age of automation, which began with the Computer Revolution.
Just as the Industrial Revolution eventually brought about extraordinary benefits for society, artificial intelligence systems have the potential to do the same. But Frey argues that this depends on how the short term is managed. In the 19th century, workers violently expressed their concerns over machines taking their jobs. The Luddite uprisings joined a long wave of machinery riots that swept across Europe and China. Today’s despairing middle class has not resorted to physical force, but their frustration has led to rising populism and the increasing fragmentation of society. As middle-class jobs continue to come under pressure, there’s no assurance that positive attitudes to technology will persist.
The Industrial Revolution was a defining moment in history, but few grasped its enormous consequences at the time. The Technology Trap demonstrates that in the midst of another technological revolution, the lessons of the past can help us to more effectively face the present.
- Listening Length15 hours and 31 minutes
- Audible release dateJune 18 2019
- LanguageEnglish
- ASINB07NGLRS51
- VersionUnabridged
- Program TypeAudiobook
Free with an Audible trial
$0.00$0.00
- 1 credit a month good for any title of your choice, yours to keep.
- The Plus Catalogue—listen all you want to thousands of Audible Originals, podcasts, and audiobooks.
- Access to exclusive member-only sales, as well as 30% off your purchases of any additional titles.
- After 30 days Audible is $14.95/month + applicable taxes. Renews automatically.
Buy with 1-Click
$23.00$23.00
Product details
Listening Length | 15 hours and 31 minutes |
---|---|
Author | Carl Benedikt Frey |
Narrator | Richard Lyddon |
Audible.ca Release Date | June 18 2019 |
Publisher | Princeton University Press |
Program Type | Audiobook |
Version | Unabridged |
Language | English |
ASIN | B07NGLRS51 |
Best Sellers Rank | #69,489 in Audible Books & Originals (See Top 100 in Audible Books & Originals) #113 in Computer Science (Audible Books & Originals) #183 in Labour Policy (Books) #218 in Computer History & Culture (Audible Books & Originals) |
Customer reviews
Top reviews from other countries

Its a very good reprise of the effect of technology historically. There's some interesting data on how steam, electricity and so on affected different strata of society; and for how long. There's a decent section on the effect that computers had on productivity and earnings. Then he refers to the research that he's done into what industries will likely be affected by AI; but never really summarises it very well. I don't need a research fellow to tell me that autonomous driving tech will be bad for truck drivers' jobs. What I would like to have read about is which are the industries that will be affected by AI that are not so screamingly obvious.
Overall, rather disappointed, even though I thought the historical section was really interesting. Maybe he would have been better cutting out the last bit and just calling it an analysis of the historical impact of technology on employment?

Frey points to the effect of competition between cities and nations as the mechanism allowing technology to triumph into implementation. He may thereby be stating a case for the autonomy of technology in its human nexus, but he doesn’t engage with the literature on the philosophy of technology, ranging from Heidegger to Habermas, Ellul to Feenberg, which debates this and other crucial points. This loses analytical power.
Narrative style faces the challenge of the selective criteria applied to create the account. Frey regularly refers to a stream of academic papers, (nearly always authored by two economists!), and then makes assertions and ponders interpretations without rigorous empirical test. He doesn’t offer any overall explanatory hypothesis of technology for test. This leads to a lack of synthesis and focus. Frey’s implied conclusion is perhaps that technology is beneficial if society manages its more immediate adverse outcomes.
His review of potential actions is brief. In particular he summarily dismisses basic income as a necessary resolution. Despite frequently quoting Robert Solow, Frey omits Solow’s insightful remark on basic income made in ‘Revisiting Keynes, Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren, Lorenzo Pecchi and Gustavo Piga (MIT 2008, p92) where Solow points out that with burgeoning production from advanced technologies ‘the wage will absorb only a small fraction of all that output. The rest will be imputed to capital...the extreme case of this is the common scare about universal robots: labour is no longer needed at all. How will we then live? The ownership of capital will have to be democratised...(needing) some form of universal dividend...Not much thought has been given to this problem’.
Having described the hollowing out of the middle class and the prediction of his own joint paper that AI automation could threaten 47% of US jobs, he dismisses basic income because ‘there is little to suggest that widespread joblessness is imminent’ or ‘fears that work will disappear have always turned out to be false alarm’ (p356). This is inconsistent with his earlier argument, but also misses the point that it is not total employment which is necessarily threatened, but aggregate consumer income, whose demonstrable relative decline triggers excessive consumer debt to support expenditure, leading to consequent economic crisis. This is the economic technology trap to which a basic income funded by sovereign money is the unique and necessary solution.


