Top critical review
Reviewed in Canada on August 24, 2019
The author says that for a more scientific view of his ideas, we should read his other book. Okay, fine. I appreciate writers not repeating too much. But I wish there had been just a little bit. I mean, at least throw in some citations and footnotes. To make this worse, I read an excerpt from his other book, and he tells a different version of one of the stories so I know that the conclusion of one of them is made up. I know writers twist stories but it was just hard to tolerate in a book that nearly entirely based on stories.